Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hero's 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete all. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 20:46, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Hero's 4

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Mixed martial arts event that does not pass GNG. No lasting historical significance. No independent sourcing. Primarily results listing. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 13:37, 22 December 2011 (UTC) Also listing: See similar AfD discussions:
 * Hero's 5
 * Hero's 6
 * Hero's 7
 * Hero's 8
 * Hero's Lithuania 2006
 * Articles for deletion/Hero's Lithuania 2005 The result was delete
 * Articles for deletion/Hero's 2007 in Korea The result was delete
 * Articles for deletion/Hero's 10 The result was delete
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 13:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete There may be sources available in the Japanese media for some of these Hero's events. However, the translations from the Google few news hits I found weren't enough for me to understand exactly which event(s) was being discussed. English language reports appears to only be match results combined with the current state of the articles, it seems the coverage is all just WP:ROUTINE.  --TreyGeek (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all The articles are merely routine sports reporting. They lack good sources and give no reasons why the events are notable. Jakejr (talk) 18:52, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:NOTNEWSPAPER, WP:RECENTISM, and WP:EVENT. These sporting events with some notable participants meet no section of WP:EVENT. Sourcing is WP:ROUTINE and wholly inadequate to support retention. I have no difficulty with some of this material being merged with Hero's, which badly needs the citation, even if only from semi-promotional site Sherdog (which is at least marginally independent). BusterD (talk) 14:49, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.