Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herobed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 03:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Herobed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company lacking in-depth, non-trivial, independent support. References are company websites, blogs, articles that do not mention subject, and press releases. A couple of short articles are references, but not enough to establish notability. red dogsix (talk) 03:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:49, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete – Per source searches, does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH at this time. North America1000 04:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. I'm finding social media profiles, non-notable blogs, and promotional mentions/press releases, but no in-depth coverage to help show that the subject meets WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  gongshow  talk  06:02, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above, especially agree with Gongshow. Fails GNG. -- HighKing ++ 13:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.