Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herobracelet

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August &#9742; 19:08, August 29, 2005 (UTC)

Herobracelet
Erwin Walsh


 * Comment: It could evolve into more than just a spam article.   ‡   Jarlaxle   20:14, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * If it evolves to the point where it becomes well known (Notability HeroBracelet) then it will deserve an entry. Until then: Delete. --GraemeL (talk) 20:40, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Vuilnis.JPG|75px]]. Sorry, couldn't resist. Sabine's Sunbird 21:25, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Nice. Erwin Walsh


 * Strong delete. No references from external sources explaining cultural impact means: not notable. Let's not let these vultures use the EnWiki to make money off of the tragedy of the Iraq War unless they do something encyclopedically noteworthy. Fernando Rizo T/C 21:27, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Pilatus 22:00, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Spammish.Amren (talk) 00:14, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * [[image:Hamster sandwich.jpg|75px]] Extreme hamster, for the usual reasons. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 00:52, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Špããmm. Alf 01:45, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I can't top that with a better image ,Alf. Delete as spamvertising. - Mgm|(talk) 10:52, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I DON"T LIKE SPAM!!!Indrian 06:55, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - spam - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  15:48, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.