Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heroes of Graxia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Petroglyph Games. Stifle (talk) 15:04, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Heroes of Graxia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I am also nominating the following related page under the same rationale:

Contested PROD (no reasons given), I'm reiterating my PROD rationale: No significant independent and reliable third party coverage to verify article content and support aneutral article, currently appears to fail our inclusion guidelines. All sources point to either blogs or the publisher's own website. MLauba (Talk) 11:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  MLauba (Talk) 11:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  —MLauba (Talk) 11:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Appears to have been just released, so we should be on the lookout for industry press covering this. Still, I'm not sure we're going to find anything appropriate.  I wonder if there's any interest in combining NN games, like this one appears to be, into "List of games by (foo publishing)" or something like that? Jclemens (talk) 15:14, 2 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I think this kind of approach has been tried before, and I'd say that while merges into the producer's company are probably uncontroversial, lists of games made by producer will eventually get challenged if none of the list entries have any notability of their own. MLauba (Talk) 13:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete Generally I would just say "Delete" given there are no sources, but it looks like the gaming company's Wikipedia article itself is somewhat sourced, implying that sourcing is possible, just not actually present. Of course, until sources ARE present, this article absolutely does not pass Wikipedia's guidelines.  For all we know, the gaming company had plans for this game and spent some time building the nice professional website for it, then canceled it or went out of business or lost the rights to it in a lawsuit or...etc. etc., which are just a few examples of why Wikipedia doesn't grant much leeway.  Yes, it looks like it's probably a real thing.  But probably isn't definitely.  Cite it or lose it. -Markeer 20:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect both to the parent company. Not finding notability, but enough sources to believe it is real.  Hobit (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Petroglyph Games per WP:PRODUCT. Reliable sources (Gamasutra, Gamedaily etc) are so far only printing press releases. Marasmusine (talk) 14:12, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to company article. 2005 (talk) 00:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.