Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herresta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Unopposed withdrawal by nom -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:08, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Herresta

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There is no sourcing to verify notability, and the unsourced text gives no reason to consider the building notable. It does exist in Norwegian and Swedish wikipedia, but that's not really relevant. Cerejota (talk) 06:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

It is included in Nordisk familjebok, as indicated in the article. L-mariefred (talk) 06:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Noted after the AfD nomination. However, why is that a claim to notability?--Cerejota (talk) 06:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Because Nordisk familjebok is a recognized Swedish encyclopedia which would only include notable subjects? Herresta is not a building, it is a large estate/manor in Sweden with a long history. There are several other articles on such manors in Wikipedia. L-mariefred (talk) 06:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. It would be possible to write a well-sourced, encyclopaedic article with this title (or translate one from a Scandinavian wiki), so deletion is inappropriate.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  10:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nominator is mistaken when saying it's not sourced. Would like to see more about the architecture of the place though. - Mgm|(talk) 11:01, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Expansion needed, but I have little doubt that the article is about a notable building. One might also legitimately compare its history to that of many of the early, bot-imported articles - as in, a single referenced, stub start. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 11:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Close request from nominator I think adding the Nordisk familjebok as a source, and the discussion reveals there is notability. So please close.--Cerejota (talk) 19:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.