Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hersi Ally Said


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete with clear assessment of sources showing gng is not met. Fenix down (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Hersi Ally Said

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Accomplished, but not enough in-depth coverage included currently, or found through searches to pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  14:24, 2 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 14:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I don’t see anything in-depth to support this BLP. Mccapra (talk) 14:53, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep This article looks likes it only needs to be re written, because the topic has multiple link sources (notable) to support it from searching engines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.222.181.33 (talk) 16:17, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. This exists only to promote its subject and has no apparent significant coverage in WP:RS.  The above comment does not appear factually accurate from my search; all I see are passing mentions.  FalconK (talk) 06:46, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. 1.WWW.Goal.com, www.sportsleo.com, and www.swahili.crni.in All of this site are reliable sources, and its not only mentions. This article lack to be re written proffessional, WP:BP, WP:SP. 4realtz (talk) 07:43, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Are you sure the coverage cited is significant and independent? Let's break it down in the source assess table.  Merely being quoted in the press a bit about your job doesn't make you notable.  FalconK (talk) 02:38, 7 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per above RedPatchBoy (talk) 13:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.