Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hertfordshire bus route 84


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 03:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Hertfordshire bus route 84

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable bus route, despite its age. Sources are a mixed bag of print sources, most if not all are now no longer distributed. Two are from the operator - can these be regarded as notable??? Nordic  Nightfury  12:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Nightfury  12:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Nordic   Nightfury  12:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing to suggest enough notability to warrant inclusion, open and shut case really! Jeni  ( talk ) 14:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PRODUCT. Goods and services should be covered at the providers' pages. Not notable in itself.Charles (talk) 18:02, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The route has a lot of historical facts about it, which makes it notable. Surely more sources can be found in books that will establish its notability. Class455 (talk) 04:06, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The only book source, other than Wikipedia books, found on google books is the book by Billings which is self-published and therefore unsuitable as a source.Charles (talk) 09:05, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per Charles, Non notable bus route, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Neutral - as the author I am neutral although I copied it to an area where I might work on it in future. This bus route has gone through a lot of changes and has recently been both expanded and extended but until some more decent sources can be found and included, I'll leave its fate up to everyone ese. Btw Nordic, just because a book is no longer published does not mean that it is any less reliable. Simply south ...... time, deparment skies for just 10 years 17:47, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cavarrone 07:27, 2 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.