Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hertz Nazaire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 06:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Hertz Nazaire

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

does not meet criteria for visual artists -- no works in museums, no substantial coverage  DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 18:44, 24 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle (talk • contribs) 19:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment not notable as a painter for the reasons in the nom, but possibly as sickle cell activist? Found and added two sources on that, but not yet sure it's enough hence comment. Will keep looking Star   Mississippi  19:36, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: 3rd relist in the hopes of generating more discussion. Are there enough sources available to pass WP:GNG? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Coffee  //  have a ☕️ //  beans  // 06:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Mild Keep He's mentioned in a paragraph in a USA Today article, and Conneticut paper and in MIT and Univ of Conneticut newspapers. He's gotten a bit of traction. I also find a few paragraphs about him in Google Scholar, in a book . I think he passes notability tests. Oaktree b (talk) 20:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete no substantial coverage. "mentions in 2 newspapers and 2 student papers" are mentions,, not substantial coverage. The "few paragraphs" in a book, are each 2 short sentences long. That's not substantial coverage.  . "He's gotten a bit of traction." is pretty much the definition of Not Yet Notable. ` DGG ( talk ) 21:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * DGG, just a heads up since there have been multiple relists and this was a while ago, you're the nom here.  Star   Mississippi  22:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Mild delete Gusfriend (talk) 02:55, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete The only sources that go into any detail are primary source interviews. Star Garnet (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.