Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hetemeel.com

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Joyous (talk) 16:39, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

Hetemeel.com
A website that has four pictures on it that people can edit. Yippee. Francs2000 | Talk 23:53, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable webcruft. Gwk 23:56, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Alexa #602,017. Dcarrano 00:15, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep    . Especially #4. Many thousands of images have been made there. Of course I'm probably biased because I created the article. --pile0nadestalk 00:12, 18 July 2005 (UTC) Comment - Alexa Rank is irrelevant here. The website is to Fark.com as Slashdot trolling phenomena is to Slashdot. Except it is not trolling. And there has been no effort made to ban people who post the images on Fark like there is for trolls on Slashdot. --pile0nadestalk 00:37, 18 July 2005 (UTC) Besides, the GNAA site site has an Alexa Rank of 422,150, and it wasn't deleted. --pile0nadestalk 00:58, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect - I am changing my vote to delete as there is a much better article at HA! HA! guy. --pile0nadestalk 11:16, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN advertisement.  Postdlf 00:15, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Fark.com has an article, is that just an advertisment? (Unsigned comment by )
 * Fark at least appears to have some notability, and no-one has nominated it for deletion yet. -- Francs2000 | Talk [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] 00:30, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Because fark.com doesn't have an Alexa rating as poor as 602,017. But if we did delete the Fark article, would that be enough to discourage you people from wasting our time here?  It's worth a shot...  Postdlf 01:06, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Farkcruft, at least until it gets more than four edit pictures... -- Grev -- Talk 00:55, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a noteworthy website. Francs2000's stated reason for deletion commits the straw man fallacy. His sardonic followup indicates his personal scorn toward Hetemeel (and Ha Ha Guy). ArcTheLad 03:06, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no evidence of notability in the article.  CDC   (talk)  05:37, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Give a small explanation of the site on the Ha Ha Guy page and leave it at that.--Daveswagon 09:23, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete advertising for a non notable website. JamesBurns 09:45, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable.--Ben Houston 03:42, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to HA! HA! guy, until hetemeel.com becomes notable for something more than the laughing one. Darobsta 11:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks notability. Flawiki 12:33, July 20, 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.