Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heteropatriarchy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Heteropatriarchy
Stub; obvious neologism. Benwing 08:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. WP:NFT Ohconfucius 08:59, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as yet another non-notable neologism. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 10:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 14:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO, WP:OR, and WP:V. Scorpiondollprincess 16:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete in the interests of attempting to suppress the truth. Danny Lilithborne 20:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, but not for the above reasons, but because this concept is better illustrated with heterosexism or just plain patriarchy. CaveatLectorTalk 22:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment While my initial thought was delete, a search on Google Scholar gives 285 results, including results that appear to be over 10 years old. However, I mostly agree with CaveatLector. Mairi 07:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.