Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hetman Uneraser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Hetman Uneraser

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article from software's creator that lacks third-party sources; all the sources are by websites that also host the downloads. Article fails WP:GNG and utterly fails WP:NSOFT. Aoidh (talk) 18:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Q VVERTYVS  (hm?) 23:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 12:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Please check it non promotional reviews:
 * 1) 3Dnews - http://www.3dnews.ru/584888. 3Dnews is a very popular and trusted IT site - http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.3dnews.ru. This review contained 5 pages: http://www.3dnews.ru/584888, http://www.3dnews.ru/584888/page-2.html, http://www.3dnews.ru/584888/page-3.html, http://www.3dnews.ru/584888/page-4.html, http://www.3dnews.ru/584888/page-5.html.
 * 2) Remontcompa - http://remontcompa.ru/754-hetman-uneraser-36.html. Remontcompa is a popular computer blog - http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http%3A%2F%2Fremontcompa.ru.
 * 3) Helplamer - http://helplamer.ru/?p=1520. Helplamer is a popular computer blog - http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/http%3A%2F%2Fhelplamer.ru.
 * 4) Softkey - http://www.softkey.info/reviews/review11084.php and http://www.softkey.info/reviews/review16560.php. Softkey is a very popular and trusted IT site - http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/softkey.ru.

Hetman Uneraser has reviews on different languages:
 * 1) Findmysoft is popular and trusted software archive: http://hetman-uneraser.findmysoft.com/. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/findmysoft.com.
 * 2) Informer is popular and trusted IT site: http://hetman-uneraser.software.informer.com/. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/informer.com.
 * 3) Idnes is popular and trusted IT site: http://cestiny.idnes.cz/hetman-uneraser-0jz-/Software.aspx?c=A150105_043548_bw-cestiny-software_zel. http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/idnes.cz.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.196.121.155 (talk) 09:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Blogs and download hosts do not show notability, nor do run-of-the-mill reviews, as WP:NSOFT points out. It does not meet any of the notability criteria that software should meet. - Aoidh (talk) 10:03, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

3Dnews (http://www.3dnews.ru/), Software Informer (http://software.informer.com/), Idnes (idnes.cz) are not blogs or download hosts sites.

I check all other articles from this list - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_data_recovery_software. Most of the articles contains links to the official website or computer blog only. Please check:
 * 1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recover_My_Files
 * 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GetDataBack
 * 3) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BackTrack
 * 4) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GetDataBack
 * 5) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BartPE
 * 6) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boot_Repair_Disk
 * 7) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hiren%27s_BootCD
 * 8) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GParted
 * 9) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CDRoller
 * 10) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_Recovery_Wizard
 * 11) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosoft_Engineering
 * 12) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dvdisaster
 * 13) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FileSalvage
 * 14) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TotalRecovery
 * 15) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRecover — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.196.121.155 (talk) 15:21, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That other potentially problematic articles exist is not cause to keep this one, each article must stand on its own merits, and this one fails to meet the notability requirements. - Aoidh (talk) 15:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now at best and draft and userfy if needed as there's simply not enough to convince. SwisterTwister   talk  06:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:07, 3 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:54, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - none of the sources cited are high quality. SJK (talk) 10:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.