Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hetty King (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 02:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Hetty King (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Superfluous dab page made redundant by existing hatnote. Page is orphaned and an unlikely search term Tassedethe (talk) 10:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions.   —Tassedethe (talk) 10:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Doesn't hurt. And useful for research purpose since it appears in Category:Human name disambiguation pages. --Edcolins (talk) 13:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Useless and orphaned. WP:NOHARM is no reason to keep.  Listing in a category is no reason to keep an otherwise useless page. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Two is the minimal number for a disambiguation page. Having more than one way to navigate to articles is better than just one way. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * As ever, two is the minimum if there is no primary topic; four is the minimum with a primary topic, although threes will also be kept (threes can be handled with two other uses on the base name). -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:40, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete, not needed as a hatnote does the trick. Tavix (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment – We could also add one other Hetty King, the wife of James Green Martin, daughter of Charles King, and sister of General Rufus King. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 22:57, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.