Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HexaKarta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:34, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

HexaKarta

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable game, "currently under development as an online game.". Everard Proudfoot (talk) 02:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Notablity isn't in distrubution, "currently under development as an online game." is in reference to the electronic version of the game. The physical copy of the game has existed since 1998 when I created it. (talk) 02:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanocathail (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, promotional. notability (in the sense we use at Wikipedia to determine whether we cover a subject) is in neither distribution nor development, but in independent, reliable, secondary sources, of which I can find none. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 20:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: "Prototypes of the game do exist but it has mainly only had a small cult following and has never been commercially produced." Joe Chill (talk) 00:21, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I am unable to verify the existence of this game, let alone its notability. Only sources in article are two fairly murky pictures and Google searches return absolutely nothing. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete "Prototypes of the game do exist but it has mainly only had a small cult following and has never been commercially produced." ... in other words, the very definition of completely non-notable. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.