Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hey Leonardo (She Likes Me for Me)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:25, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Hey Leonardo (She Likes Me for Me)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NSONG. Being a "a top-20 hit in three countries" is not reasonable citation. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:10, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It does indicate that the song may be notable if it's charted, but we need sourcing that talks about the song. It's not a "free pass" just for charting, but it helps. Oaktree b (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - charting on four major country charts is an extremely strong indicator of notability. It's exceedingly unlikely that a song would perform so well globally as a single and then proceed to not have a few publications cover the song. If you're having a hard time finding coverage, it's likely because it's a single that was big prior to the internet era. Coverage is likely locked away in hard copy publications. Sergecross73   msg me  19:26, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The song is still discussed 20 yrs after the fact and . I can look for more, but we've proven notability. Oaktree b (talk) 19:27, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * And here from a period dead-tree edition of Billboard . Oaktree b (talk) 19:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * And a mini review of the song on a period CD (which I think I might have actually....) . Trivia about the lyrics . Oaktree b (talk) 19:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep I don't know what you mean by "not reasonable citation", but that charting is clearly sourced, as is the Australian Gold cert. It could use more to verify other information, but that's more than enough for notability. QuietHere (talk &#124; contributions) 19:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep per above. This song has charted in numerous countries and this is sourced in the article. This passes GNG and NSONG: "Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts." This article is reasonably detailed aside from just the chart listings. See no reason for deletion. ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  21:03, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. It may not have set the world on fire, but it still achieved notable success. ResPM  (T&#x1F508;&#x1F3B5;C) 12:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:NSONG as 33rd on the Billboard Top 100. And Oaktree has uncovered further RS. Lightburst (talk) 14:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.