Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hi-C (rapper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Discussion moved to Deletion review. ... disco spinster   talk  00:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi-C (rapper)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm bring this to AfD because it's been deleted a few times but I'm not sure if it's obviously non-notable. The article claims that he has recorded for some high-profile labels such as Hollywood Records and Tommy Boy Records, and appeared on songs for well-known rappers. A few of his songs are also in the soundtrack of Malibu's Most Wanted (although I don't think we should hold that against him). He also walked the red carpet (and was attacked) at The Source awards, which was a newsworthy occurrence. For the record, I feel it is a weak keep. ... disco spinster   talk  02:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

If he was involved in the making of Malibu's Most Wanted, I'm going to vote keep based on this alone, as I found that film to be quite hilarious. I realize my bias however - as a former resident of Ventura County, I was exposed to entirely too many people who acted entirely too much just like the protagonist of that film. Some, almost exactly. So, I found it far funnier than most audiences. Also, this is doubtless part of the reason I now live in Arizona... Zaphraud (talk)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 04:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 04:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, although I will admit that I'm primarily motivated toward keep because I've heard his music before. Way back in middle school. damn. Anyway, I fully agree with nom's rationale. hateless 20:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm really not understanding the motivation for this AfD - given the claims and the nominator stating "for the record" that it's a weak keep, this discussion shouldn't technically be taking place. WP:COMMON. I'm also going to go out on a limb and declare that this is going to be a snow clause candidate in the near future.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 20:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I brought this to AfD because the article was being speedily deleted on a regular basis and I didn't feel that it was warranted.  I couldn't bring it to WP:DRV because it had been recreated so at that point it wasn't deleted (although it did have a speedy tag).  Someone, somewhere, wants it deleted but it shouldn't be speedied so I put it here.  If my "for the record" comment muddles it, I can remove it.  ...  disco spinster   talk  00:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)  Edited to add: I have looked more closely at WP:DRV and see that existing articles can, in fact, be reviewed.  I'll close this AfD on procedure and move the discussion there.  ...  disco spinster   talk  00:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.