Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hi-Finesse Music & Sound


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:01, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi-Finesse Music & Sound

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Previously put to PROD by. Article does not prove why the company is notable and it contains no third-party, reliable sources. "Questionable for WP:CORP and WP:GNG".  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.   Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.   Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG; I would have been tempted to speedy this as promotional.TheLongTone (talk) 14:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Company has enough notability, creating music for trailers for major films. I have revised the article to bring in some refs and fix up the formatting.--Bernie44 (talk) 21:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing at all for any applicable notability, not yet solidly acceptable. SwisterTwister   talk  20:50, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources are all very low quality, or else passing mentions.  InsertCleverPhraseHere  00:33, 30 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.