Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HiMama


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 06:53, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

HiMama

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Other than ONE BNN piece, the rest of this is self published/promo (and published in several sites by the same employee of HiMama) so it lacks the necessary independent rs. CUPIDICAE💕 11:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * delete Of no value, and does not meet the requirements for BLP — billinghurst  sDrewth  11:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Sadly, there is some coverage here. It's not huge, but this terrifying little app does seem to be known in the press. E.g. Treehugger: "I was asked to download an app called HiMama and soon began receiving detailed accounts about his day. Everything from the meals he eats and how much, to when he sleeps and uses the potty is recorded, along with occasional pictures." Or this: "New app keeps Durham parents in the loop while kids are at daycare", and the Financial Times (I could only see the snippet), and finally, this. The company has a 1300% growth rate, so no doubt more coverage is on the way. --- Possibly (talk) 04:25, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Other than ft, those aren't really meaningful rs and they mostly just quote a piece written by the owners. If more coverage is "on the way", I'd be surprised given the article is 4 years old and the app is 7. It's not really a case of too soon. CUPIDICAE💕  15:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Scratch that, the ft piece is an op-ed. See this.  CUPIDICAE💕  15:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations is WP:NCORP and applies a stricter interpretation of requirements than for other topics. In short, WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. That means, nothing that relies on company information or advertorials, announcements or interviews, etc. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 21:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.