Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hiccup fetishism (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as repost - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] 16:02, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Hiccup fetishism
Delete - Seems non-notable, original research, or just a joke article. Zero google hits for "Hiccup fetishism" - note that at first it seems that "Hiccup fetish" gets 11,300 hits, but most of these are a single porn site - excluding that gets 767 hits, most of which are mentions in blogs, forums, or yet more porn sites. Mdwh 03:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, could be a hoax. Royboycrashfan 03:20, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN. Now I've heard everything -- † Ðy§ep§ion † 03:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:09, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete- wtf? Reyk 06:55, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this nonsense. Marskell 08:50, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete boderline nonsense Avi 15:36, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.