Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hicham idelcaid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:43, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Hicham idelcaid

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have declined a nomination for A7 speedy deletion since the article does contain some sourcing, which does constitute an assertion of importance. With that said, I cannot see that the subject of the article has made any encyclopedically significant accomplishments beyond what is normal for his career, and I will therefore recommend delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  19:06, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * speedy delete Then he followed his energy and discovered a new passion, and he started helping people and sharing his passion and spreading positive energy. is utter fucking nonsense. The rest is completely unremarkable and this is what a7/g11 are designed for. None of the sources discuss him in depth and those that do are garbage. Praxidicae (talk) 19:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete the positive energy hasn’t reached this far I’m afraid. Mccapra (talk) 22:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Do I really need to justify that? Alright: WP:BIO. The few alleged sources are dubious, to put it mildly. Reiki healers (and although you can't see me, I am doing air quotes) are thirteen in a dozen, and there's nothing to suggest this one is in any way remarkable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- Devokewater  (&#x1F989; talk talk&#x1F989;) 19:49, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment There is also a possible COI here; the creating editor claims to have personally taken the photo which now appears in the article, suggesting a connection with the subject. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:07, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and is definitely very much looking like a resume rather than an encyclopedia entry. --  Dane talk  04:20, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and the other comment above. Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 11:07, 2 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.