Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hidden Valley High School (Grants Pass, Oregon)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Nomination withdrawn. If there are still concerns with the article, I would suggest not bringing it back to AFD until it has has been around a bit longer. Camaron | Chris (talk) 21:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Hidden Valley High School (Grants Pass, Oregon)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable highschool - links/ references are primary in nature, referring to the district or school itself. In the light of revision and user comments below, I will withdraw this nomination for deletion. Keep Wisdom89 (talk) 07:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. By longstanding convention (though sadly not yet codified into full-blown policy - sigh), high schools are inherently notable. See WP:SCL. The article definitely needs work, though. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 08:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * There is nothing in WP:SCL that indicates all high schools are inherently notable. I think you're referring to a redirect, to the appropriate district. Wisdom89 (talk) 08:23, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.   —Camaron | Chris (talk) 11:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - nominated for deletion 3 minutes after creation which is utterly unacceptable and against the spirit of WP:AfD which says Before nominating a recently created article ... Unless it is obviously a hopeless case, consider sharing your reservations with the article creator, mentioning your concerns on the article's discussion page, and/or adding a "cleanup" template, instead of bringing the article to AfD.. This is a high school that is significant in its community and the article has the sources needed to meet WP:N. TerriersFan (talk)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.   —Katr67 (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.