Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hidding


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:09, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Hidding

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neologism, no sources, probably unverifiable. Was prodded, prod removed by author without improvement. Huon (talk) 08:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as nonsense. Alexius08 is welcome to talk about his contributions. 09:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Already exists in Wiktionary as hiding. It's actually in much wider usage than merely in regions of New Zealand. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 09:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not exactly nonsense, but exists in Wiktionary.  Matt  (  Talk  )   10:25, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * If deleted, redirect to Concealment as a plausible misspelling/mistyping of "hiding". The aforementioned Wiktionary link to the correct spelling is also present at this target (although the difference between the meaning of hiding used here and in the target article may be a slight concern, but this could be solved with an appropriate dablink). -- saberwyn 11:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Not certain if this is nonsense, but I am certain about WP:NEO. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:24, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a dictionary definition, not an encyclopaedia article, and is already on Wiktionary (correctly spelled). Beeswaxcandle (talk) 00:17, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - neologism without reliable sources. dramatic (talk) 00:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  dramatic (talk) 00:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  dramatic (talk) 00:27, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I had previously put a PROD template on this article, and agree completely with the nominator. Even if it could be verified, it is a definition only that apparently is already covered at Wiktionary. Beeblebrox (talk) 04:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * hey wait, did I just see a snowflake? Beeblebrox (talk) 09:45, 20 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:RS.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 07:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.