Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hide N Seek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Hide N Seek

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:GNG, as the content of cited sources, despite being in big-name Nigerian publications, are limited to unbylined, routine pre-release PR coverage and should not be considered in assessing notability. Despite the lush prose these sources use to describe the film's impending success, I was unable to find any trace of independent coverage in the form of film reviews, even from the same papers promoting it pre-release (although the search is admittedly made much more complicated by the existence of other films by this or similar titles, and inconsistency on the part of cited sources as to whether it's "and" or "N". signed,Rosguill talk 21:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Nigeria. signed,Rosguill talk 21:37, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:NFILM and WP:SIGCOV. Article is entirely sourced to press releases. I could find zero significant independent coverage, including reviews. Appears to have been largely ignored once released.4meter4 (talk) 17:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.