Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hideks


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Hideks

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NEO applies here. Seems a non-notable neologism. - RUL3R *trolling *vandalism 08:12, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Nothing on scholar, news seems to be someones surname. Books I thought there might have been something but the results are due to OCR scanning errors. Nothing substantial on regular Google. Was not able to obtain anything from the ref provided. Might be more meaningful in a different language?Calaka (talk) 08:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete looks like a memory aid created by a student (or teacher) to help memorise an essay. Completely unsuitable for Wikipedia. Hut 8.5 15:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Strong delete per all above. B.Rossow talk contr 18:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone else who has commented to date. Thryduulf (talk) 11:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I found zero sources for this. Joe Chill (talk) 02:17, 25 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.