Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hierarchical system theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 00:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Hierarchical system theory
Hoax or Original research. The article makes no sense, and appears to have no relation to the term as it seems to be actually used. See also Articles for deletion/Neurokinetic harmonics and Articles for deletion/Neurokinetics Nonsuch 23:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This poorly written article does seem to be at least tangentially speaking about peer reviewed mathematical modeling concept . It would need some major clean up.--Nick Y. 23:22, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Response: Sure, the phrase 'Hierarchical system theory' does exist outside of wikipedia. But the definition in the article bears no resemblance to the the paper you cite. Nonsuch 23:50, 11 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete along with Neurokinetics--again, either way per nom. --Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 00:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. If it reappeared with sources, that might be different. Septentrionalis 02:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete with no bias towards recreation with different content, as essay/OR/NPOV. Clearly the author is reaching conclusions that are loosly related to a substantive concept that should occupy this namespace that have not been reached before and are unsupported to boot.--Nick Y. 17:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:HOAX/WP:OR/WP:NONSENSE. (Chose one or more.)  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 21:49, 13 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.