Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hifishi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-10 21:03Z 

Hifishi

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Ok, this is obviously a fake Pokémon, but that's not the main reason I'm putting this up for deletion - a fake Pokémon could in theory, be notable. The reason is that it fails WP:NFT: "Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day". After searching Google for a bit, it became clear that "Hifishi" is one of the fakes from the "PokéGods" craze a few years back (remember "MewThree"?) - a craze that consisted entirely of...kids making things up in school one day, and telling their gullible friends in order to trick them into glitching up their games. "Hifishi" wasn't even that notable as far as these fakes went, and to top it all off, the page treats "Hifishi" not as a fake, but as an "unused Pokémon" (although it does say that the most common code is fake). This does not belong on Wikipedia by any stretch of the imagination. ~e.o.t.d~ 06:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom. fraggle 09:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete CSD A7 Hobbeslover talk/contribs 20:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOT a list of hoaxes, either. Xiner (talk, email) 21:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. JPG-GR 03:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Pokemon is bad enough. We do not also need fake hoax pokemons.:-)-MsHyde 03:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.