Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hifn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus article seems to need cleanup rather than deletion. W.marsh 21:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Hifn

 * View single debate
 * View single debate

I created this page, and it has been going nowhere. Company is a tiny subsidiary with no notable products. All unverified statements in article were likely added by employees. Brownsteve 23:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Need to supply press articles on why/how it is notable. It is not a huge company, with 200 employees and annual revenues of US$45 million. Furthermore, the company is principally an OEM/B to B supplier of network, storage and security system. As it deals mainly with brand-name manufacturers, it is never likely to be a household name. In fact, few are likely to have heard of it, unless someone can prove otherwise... Ohconfucius 09:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Irritated Weak Keep. I don't like this article, and would like to see it cleaned up. But notability is clearly asserted: "market leader in security processors" and "first company to offer a processor with integrated encryption and compression". I regard these as notable achievements, if they are true and documented appropriately. Ohconfucius misses the point when he says that "few are likely to have heard of it": we have plenty of articles about things that few people have heard of. What matters is whether people using Wikipedia to help them research their interest ( security processor design, say ) would want to know more. I feel the article needs a heavy re-write, but I believe that if this can be done it should stay: it's of marginal interest, but we're not paper. WMMartin 18:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.