Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Maintenance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 02:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

High Maintenance

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per WP:MUSIC, future releases are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found. SummerPhD (talk) 19:13, 6 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I agree that this article should be deleted for the time being. At least until the title is confirmed and a cover is released. Fan4me (talk) 23:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC) *EDIT* Title was just confirmed on Miranda's twitter. http://twitter.com/MirandaBuzz Fan4me (talk) 23:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Cover art and tracklist available. We should keep the article until it did not chart on Billboard chart. OK? Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 10:56, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am not saying it shouldn't eventually have an article. However, without significant coverage in independent reliable sources, the article currently fails WP:MUSIC. When the album is released -- whether it charts or not -- it will be notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 17:07, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * How about redirect it to Miranda Cosgrove page? We'll wait for more coverage from independent reliable sources, without deletion. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 18:31, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Maybe to "Dancing Crazy" instead? - SummerPhD (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't support redirecting to "Dancing Crazy", but redirect to Miranda Cosgrove. Novice7 (talk) 05:54, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * My opinion for redirecting to the single is the principle of least surprise. The name of the album doesn't occur in the Miranda Cosgrove article until the 12th paragraph. In "Dancing Crazy", it's in the second sentence. - SummerPhD (talk) 06:21, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Incubate. It's out in a month. The notability of the artist and the amount of coverage of guest appearances, etc. so far gives a good indication that it will get further coverage nearer to its release.--Michig (talk) 13:21, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, from a notable artist and already has a charting single. My goodness, people, what would possibly be the advantage of deleting (or even incubating) an article just to certainly bring it back a month later?  Especially when the lead-up to release is when people are most likely to actually look for it and, y'know, read it.  Remember them, anyone?  The readers?  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, officially announced future release by a notable artist complete with cover art, track-list and dates. Therefore not hammertime, Crystalballery nor a failure of WP:Music. A1octopus (talk) 18:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Track listing, artwork, charting single, and a notable artist. It can even be made into a pretty respectable article if someone took their time. There is enough information. -- ipodnano05 * leave@message 04:09, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems like it has better information now. So changing to keep. Novice7 (talk) 04:14, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.