Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Voltage Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Speedy Keep. Article asserts notablility, will tag article for expansion. .  D u s t i '''talk to me 18:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

High Voltage Software

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete nn software company. Mayalld (talk) 21:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep notable, look at the list of games. Izzy007 Talk 21:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, plenty of coverage in Google News Archive including Crain's, Businessweek, Gamasutra. Needs cleanup & references. They've been around for fourteen years and have worked on many high-profile titles. --Dhartung | Talk 21:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, this article is notable RyRy5   talk  22:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Seems notable to me, although I think we could afford to add more detail about the company than simply a list, and that can be done in an upcoming update. --Bishop2 (talk) 06:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 10:41, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Their list of titles speaks for itself, but it also looks like there are lot of news and industry sources for expansion. &mdash; brighterorange  (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Looks plenty notable to my judging by their list of works. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 00:09, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand as above. --Umrguy42 (talk) 08:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep but it needs expanding. It looks to be pretty notable, but it definitely needs some work.   Red Phoenix  (Talk) 04:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.