Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highbreed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete - author requested at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Highbreed. But please continue the debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User:MMORPG research. -- RHaworth 03:21, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

Highbreed
Looks like original research. What is "Highbreed"--the word doesn't appear in the text of the article? Any chance of salvaging or merging? Paul Hope 04:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * The title is the author User:Highbreed. -- RHaworth 02:52, 5 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. "Eng4 reseacrh paper.".  User:Zoe|(talk) 07:51, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all "Eng4 reseacrh paper"s Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 12:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a repository for research papers. Sliggy 12:56, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. This is simply a copy of User:MMORPG research. -- RHaworth 02:50, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Hey please don't delete my page. Here are the this needed to be done:
 * 1) Disambiguation
 * 2) Split and merge with computer game series MMORPG. It's more than 30kb long
 * 3) Move or redirect the definition of terms to wikiionary. Rename the article to MMORPG afters research completion.
 * I need help please I am just a new user in wikipedia. Those that complain about my page being bad you can help edit my page. -- Highbreed 10:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry Highbreed, but I'll have to vote delete. First of all, I don't think that a disambig for Highbreed is necessary..the word Highbreed refers to nothing except your username. Merging the bit about MMORPGs to MMORPG wouldn't also be a really good idea in my opinion, since your opinion doesn't really add new information to the article. I assume that most of the words which you want to move to Wiktionary already have articles, but we could add those entries. We can't however move that whole section to Wiktionary, since that would be violating the Guides of Style on Wiktionary. And don't forget to mark your posts using four tildes ~ ; it makes things less confusing for both of us :P -- SoothingR 11:04, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Hey I did not mean that I am gonna move the whole page to wikitionary. I mean just some of the definition of terms. That's why I said I am going to rename it because It isn't really supposedly to be highbreed. Okay I will reopened it by the name of MMORPG

hey this is me again. Just wanted to remind you people that you can help edit my page since I already gave my username and passwrod. Okay
 * Another comment: we don't need your password to edit a page -- SoothingR 05:39, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

I vote undelete because the information quite interesting although, the page sure needs a lot of work from the experts.

Keep Hey the page is worthy. It's just that it needs more restructuring and editing. Keep Cursed user talk zoe for starting the deletion page. Grrrrrr

If you don't need a password to edit the page then why not do it then. It's your choice. However marijuana is everywhere.

1 What Wikipedia is not 1.1 Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia My article is not an encylopedia. Ahehehe 1.2 Wikipedia is not a dictionary Definiton of term can be relocated to wikitionary 1.3 Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought This is not my thought I don't even agree with soem of it. 1.4 Wikipedia is not a propaganda machine I am not an ad man 1.5 Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files I don't even have pics 1.6 Wikipedia is not a free host or webspace provider Hey I am the one paying here and contributing 1.7 Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information Well it sure looks liek one. Ahehehe 1.8 Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Hey, who will win in the election. Place your bets now! 1.9 Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors Then why did you censor my username and password. Hypocrites! 1.10 Wikipedia is not an instruction manual They should write idiots guide to wkipedia. 2 What the Wikipedia community is not 2.1 Wikipedia is not a battleground It is a cemetery 2.2 Wikipedia is not an anarchy It is dictatorship 2.3 Wikipedia is not a democracy It is corrupt 2.4 Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy We have no money to pay for bureaucrats! 2.5 Wikipedia is not a blog I agree. Anti - blog 2.6 Wikipedia is not a chatroom. Then why did you put a discussion room. arrggHH.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.