Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher Step Records (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Higher Step Records
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This independent record label fails WP:N/WP:ORG/WP:GNG as indicated by the lack of coverage by unrelated sources. Novaseminary (talk) 00:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  --   ℳ ono     00:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:19, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete no coverage, no claim to fame. -- Y not? 16:26, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - No bands on the present or past roster have WP articles, which might be one good metric for whether an indie label is worthy of inclusion (bearing in mind current notability guidelines for music, which overvalue major label contracts and undervalue cumulative career output, are completely stuffed). Carrite (talk) 16:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.