Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highervisibility


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NorthAmerica1000 23:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Highervisibility

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unimportant company. Does not meet WP:COMPANY. CerealKillerYum (talk) 05:17, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 04:33, 16 December 2014 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete This is a run-of-the-mill search engine optimization shop which has won a non-notable industry back-scratching award. It isn't notable as Wikipedia defines it. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  06:31, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 15:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per Cullen - non-notable SEO. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 23:09, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.