Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highfield Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin | wasn't he just...? 05:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Highfield Park

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is not notable enough for an article, see Notability (Places and transportation). PROD removed without comment by author. JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per failing WP:N. ArcAngel (talk) 15:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per failing WP:N. --Camaeron (talk) 19:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Notability (Places and transportation) has less than 15 Edits (total) and no consensus. Thus it can only be considered a proposal under creation. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  04:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * True; but there are also the precedents from previous AfDs summarised at WP:OUTCOMES; and in the end we fall back on the basic principles of WP:N. Whichever way you look at it, I don't think this is notable. To put it in context consider that, Wikipedia being a global encyclopedia, if this article were to stay its name would need to be changed to something like "Highfield Park, Dundrum, Dublin, Ireland". JohnCD (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I hold no opinion abouth this Article. I mearly caution against using a non-policy as evidence, and also against believing that precedents exist on WP. see WP:CCC. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  03:25, 8 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.