Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highfolk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I had previously closed this as a merge. However on examination of the article I note that there is not a single citation anywhere in the article and thus there is nothing that can be merged per WP:V. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:49, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Highfolk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 19:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:40, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 21:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete this is one of many fictional subdivisions of fictional settings for D&D. It is trivial. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll just link to what I said on the Land of Geoff, since this nomination for deletion is on the same subject for the same reason. Merge with Flanaess.  Borderlandor (talk) 05:30, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * delete merge and redirect to  Flanaess. Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:50, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. Jclemens (talk) 04:58, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.