Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highlander Timelines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Highlander Timelines

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Basically a dab page (or set index article) that was created two years ago, but still has only one blue link. At the same time, it's doubtful that any of the redlinked characters are notable enough for their own fictional timeline articles (and even Duncan is pushing it a lot under WP:NOT, but that's for another discussion). I would have prodded this dab page, but the deletion of fiction pages always seems to be controversial. – sgeureka t•c 18:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Quite unnecessary. These articles clearly aren't going to be written anytime soon, nor should we encourage people to do so. PC78 (talk) 22:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  15:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. In-universe information. I created three of the Duncan MacLeod timeline pages when I was a newbie, but now I understand the matter. Rosenknospe (talk) 16:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non notable. Schmidt (talk) 05:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnecessary index. It would be better to use templates and categories and link to articles that have real-world context about the franchise. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 13:52, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.