Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highly cited researcher

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was Speedy delete, only an external link. Thue | talk 21:23, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Highly cited researcher
Useless topic. Seems to have been created just to insert one link, though I can't tell if it's an advertisement. Fredrik | talk 11:21, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Spam, no content. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 13:19, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. No content except spam link.  Quale 16:43, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, recreation of deleted page with same content. --cesarb 17:27, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * SD as solely consisting of an ad. Fawcett5 20:40, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy --Xcali 21:15, 29 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.