Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highway Rider (Mobile Game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Highway Rider (Mobile Game)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks any indication of notability. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:28, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:51, 23 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Non Notable.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * "Lacking an indication of notability" is not sufficient for deletion. Please ensure you are doing basic WP:BEFORE checks before nominating. The VG/SE does however indicate that this is not notable, because it lacks reliable sources covering the topic in detail. --Izno (talk) 21:40, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I've been too hasty with the opening of the discussion here. I should have explained that this is a follow-up to the following original PROD nomination:
 * Thank you for the tip too; I should invest more time into these preparation steps, even when I believe that the article author was probably trying to promote an own product. Because even the possibly strongly positively biased statements, of someone who seemingly just registered to create an article about a commercial product, failed to convince me of notability, I decided to put this up for discussion. I had stumbled upon the PROD deletion in Huggle, had a look at the new edits and decided to convert the still-valid nomination of 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco into an AfD. I then notified 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco on their talk page that they might want to re-state their original arguments here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
 * It's fine. It's a clear NN--just be a little more liberal with your words in the nom next time. :) --Izno (talk) 00:12, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG due to a lack of in-depth coverage.--SamHolt6 (talk) 00:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG as set forth in the original PROD, which was copied above.49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete GNG failure and is pretty much a carbon copy of the app's description and release notes from the app store. Not our purpose.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 14:26, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, article fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 23:44, 24 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.