Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hijinks Ensue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:03, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Hijinks Ensue

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable webcomic; sourced entirely from the article's subject; little to no important coverage or reliable sources. Sugar Bear (talk) 05:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N, maybe even speedy per WP:CSD. -- Jayron  32  05:35, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 05:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 05:39, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete per WP:N, no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Thanks, Starblueheather (talk) 04:21, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per  and everyone else above.  I can't find any coverage that would satisfy the general notability guideline -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 10:15, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per above. No coverage to satisfy GNG or any other notability guidelines. EuroPride (talk) 10:40, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Delete. No evidence of notability Rirunmot 16:45, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.