Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikuta


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. If someone wants to write a sourced article on this scam martial art, they are free to write one. But this version isn't it, and for this reason it needs to go. Kimchi.sg 06:03, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Hikuta


*Delete Non-notable advertisement. It appears that aside from un-named elite mercenary units units this art is only taught by one person and the web site is really just a commercial link. Read marketing gimik.Peter Rehse 02:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 18:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Reading things like this make it sound pretty scammy. Add in the lack of references, and this looks like a high-kicking delete to the face.  --humblefool&reg; 20:35, 6 November 2006 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 17:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 01:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Uh please comment this time, people? :-) --W.marsh 01:04, 19 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - this article needs a serious overhaul, actually it needs a lot of things. I can't find an reliable sources on this, nor does it seem particularly notable. Or well recieved for that matter. wtfunkymonkey 02:33, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment From reading message boards (questionably reliable of course) some people even think this martial art is a scam, it's Russian, it's Ancient Egyptian boxing...I'm not sure what to think. I think someone with serious martial arts knowledge would be the best judge of this Missvain 04:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Tentative Delete If this is for real, then its probably worth keeping. However, there's no sources and the article is terribly written.  I'd support a keep if these were addressed in the next day or two.  --The Way 04:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.