Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilal-e-Istaqlal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 06:13, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hilal-e-Istaqlal

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

EXTREMELY POV, non-encyclopedic, little demonstration of notability, no sources. Hilal-e-istaqlal was already deleted once, though I can't remember what the content was. PROD tag removed without explanation. Miskwito 18:36, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possibly merge somewhere with Flag of Pakistan or another appropriate article.  My main issue with this article is that is has almost nothing to do with the subject.  However, the flag itself seems to be part of a notable Pakistani military ceremony, so the fact that it exists could probably find a home somewhere in another article.  Someguy1221 22:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Just to clarify, when I said merge, I only meant merge the one whole sentence on the flag itself.  Someguy1221 22:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as hopelessly POV soapboxery. DarkAudit 22:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletions.   --   &rArr; bsnowball  15:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Its unabashed enthusiasm for its subject doesn't make up for its lack of any other merit. Nick mallory 15:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Completely agree article is appallingly written and un-encyclopedic, so if it is not deleted a lot of its content will need to be. BobFromBrockley 14:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this could be included after a re-write, but I just wanted to let you know that the AfD template was removed from the article. I restored it, but those watching this debate may want to keep an eye out. Slavlin 15:52, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - but is it bad enough to be included in the humour archive maybe? DewiMorgan 20:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.