Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary 1984


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) — ΛΧΣ  21™  00:35, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Hillary 1984

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet notability guidelines. — raeky  t  23:13, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears only faintly notable; viral videos need a lot of coverage to be notable.  This only has one, possibly two, references.  LogicalCreator (talk) 07:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  05:39, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Video is notable.  Not opposed to a merge if an appropriate target can be found, though.--Milowent • hasspoken  06:36, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:ITSNOTABLE is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 01:52, 6 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete: The video's own stats show less than 100,000 hits in August 2008, long after Obama secured the nomination that year. It clearly wasn't authorized by Hillary's campaign, either. It's an oddity at best. Faustus37 (talk) 08:02, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Addendum: I like oddities, though. Faustus37 (talk) 08:06, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - This gnews search turns up many references, including Huffington Post, Seattle Post Intelligencer, New York Post, and Politico. Apparently the presidential candidates themselves commented on it as well.  --Cerebellum (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Cerebellum. It received significant coverage and critical commentary in reliable sources. Notable. --Cavarrone (talk) 07:25, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.