Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary Clinton Nude


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-05 10:05Z 

Hillary Clinton Nude

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I am amazed that this article has not been nominated till now. Blatant advertising for a non-notable book which fails WP:BK miserably - criteria 1 to 5. Only notable thing is the person whose name is in the title. Author is non-notable also. &mdash;Moondyne 05:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as nominator. &mdash;Moondyne 05:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I am swayed to vote Delete since it would appear to fail, but I ran it through Yahoo!... and egads... it has many many results. If it possible for it to be furnished with reviews from critics or any other references by the end of this AfD then Keep, if not, then Delete. --Ozgod 05:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * IMO there is a small amount of notoriety associated with the book title which may explain the search hits. But I could not find enough to satisfy the requirement for "...multiple, non-trivial published..." reviews. &mdash;Moondyne 06:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Self-published book, with no indication that it has attracted significant attention.  There appear to be few unique webpages actually related to the book anyway -- mostly directory/bookstore listings and copies of press releases.  (Incidentally, I can now add "Hilary Clinton nude" to the list of embarrassing things AFD has put into my Google search history.)  &mdash;Cel  ithemis  06:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm think the "many" result might be because of, erm,

something else, eh? Searching "Hillary Clinton Nude" give only 11,000-odd GHits. Searching the full title give only around 150 hits. --Haemo 06:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, only Google News Archive result is a press release. --Dhartung | Talk 06:35, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no significant reviews nor significant sales Alf Photoman  17:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Nomen Nescio Gnothi seauton 18:49, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Don't Delete; According to Amazon.com, a book search on Amazon for the topic "Hillary Clinton" lists this book, "Hillary Clinton Nude," number 3 in relevance among more than 7,000 titles.
 * Delete A self-published book published four months ago, it appears to have generated no reviews or news stories. Concerning the unsigned post above: number 12 when I try. Might this ranking be affected by those investigating the title? A more revealing ranking is the sales rank: #208,567. Victoriagirl 22:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unsourced article about a self-published book fails WP:BK.-- danntm T C 23:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Savidan 05:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.