Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hillary Rodham Clinton awards and honors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter123    (sing)  @ 21:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Hillary Rodham Clinton awards and honors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have nominated this article for deletion per WP:TRIVIA. Most of these awards are not notable by themselves. We should avoid creating long, vague lists. Any relevant awards can be merged elsewhere. 86.158.182.11 (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I completed the AfD for the IP. ansh666 07:10, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. While there might be some less notable awards and honors, there are more than enough left over to justify an article. TRIVIA doesn't apply here at all. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Many biographical articles have an "Awards and honors" section near the end. In this case, that section would be too long and so it was split out.  The same has been done for a number of other political figures, see for example List of honors and awards received by Bill Clinton, List of awards and honors received by Ted Kennedy, List of awards received by Al Gore, List of awards and nominations received by Wesley Clark, List of awards and honors received by George McGovern, List of honors and awards received by Jimmy Carter, List of awards and honors received by Lech Wałęsa, Awards and decorations received by Leonid Brezhnev, List of awards received by Charles, Prince of Wales, and so on.  And when it comes to Category:Lists of awards by actor and Category:Lists of awards by musician these split-out articles number well into the hundreds.  As for trivia, I disagree; you get could a good idea of the arc of her career and what issues she has been most concerned with and what groups she has been most popular among just by reading this article.  Wasted Time R (talk) 11:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Perfectly reasonable spin-off article by WP policy and practice. Otherwise there would be a constant turmoil on her main article about what to include or leave off. Borock (talk) 14:36, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 17 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Snow keep. It's a valid split.  If it had a handful of awards from bloggers and nothing else, you'd have a point.  It would overwhelm the parent article if it were merged, and there's no reason to think that notable awards are trivia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:13, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.