Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himal Karki


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:17, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Himal Karki

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Well the ref gave me nothing, so I looked up else where and can't find anything. The page is also confusing as well, just check the years on this page. Yeah....that does not make any sense at all. Wgolf (talk) 05:34, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * BTW, before anyone says it should of been a speedy, well it was apparently already. (And notice the page creator has the same name as the article) Wgolf (talk) 05:38, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:08, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete: Not notable youth leader.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 14:12, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete It looks like a hoax. I can't find anything, no reliable source found. Totally fails GNG. It also qualifies for speedy deletion criteria.   Jim Carter (from public cyber)  11:08, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
 * To be fair, I strongly doubt that this is an outright hoax; the one cited ref does indicate that he exists (although the nominator is correct that it doesn't contain anything of substance about him besides confirming his existence), and I'm willing to grant that there might very well be more substantive coverage of him in Nepali language sources than anybody's been able to find so far in English ones. That said, the role that he holds, according to this article, is not one that confers an automatic presumption of notability under WP:NPOL, and one source confirming his existence is not sufficient to get him past WP:GNG either. And while conflict of interest isn't a reason for deletion in and of itself, it doesn't do the article any favours if there are other substantive reasons for deletion in addition to the COI. So no prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can create a good version that cites enough actual sourcing to pass GNG, but this version is definitely a delete. Bearcat (talk) 17:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Not a hoax. The information of being a district representative is true. I searched for sources in Nepali language too but only I found was being a district representative from Nepali Congress, which credibly doesnot signify his notability.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 23:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.