Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himalayan Retreat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. A7 Tone 18:47, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Himalayan Retreat

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Absolutly no reliable sources, I'd even call this advertising because of the email address: Contested prod. Unfortunately doesn't meet A7. Patton t / c 12:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Google web search brings up their website, a blog and nothing else.
 * Google news search brings up nothing
 * Delete as fast as possible. Utterly non-notable building. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 12:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not even a vague assertion of notability.Ironholds (talk) 12:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - But disagree with 'as fast as possible'. There is no harm in letting pages lie for a few days whilst an AfD goes on, unless of course those pages are attack pages, or could cause some sort of other issue. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  12:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well unless WP:SNOW is invoked "as fast as possible" is an AfD :P. Ironholds (talk) 13:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No, various admins close before that point even when SNOW is not invoked, which is silly. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  13:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I was just asked if the above comment was a "stab at Julian. I assure you, it wasn't. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  13:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: non-notable, doesn't even make an assertion of importance. Can't it be speedied A7 as an organization?  I have removed the email address from article space.  Baileypalblue (talk) 13:08, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree and tagged for speedy deletion - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 15:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: No notability asserted. Nothing to even indicate that there should be an article on this.  C h a m a l  talk 13:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.