Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himalayan Welfare Organization, Pahalgam (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 21:24, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Himalayan Welfare Organization, Pahalgam
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't seems to be a notable organization. There are so many passing mentions in local newspapers with questionable reliability but I can't see anything that meets WP:ORGDEPTH and most of the cited sources doesn't mention the subject at all. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 17:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 17:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 17:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Note to closer for soft deletion:? While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was no consensus. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Previous discussions:
 * Logs:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:42, 13 November 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 17:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - sources fail to establish notability; RS barely mention the subject Spiderone  11:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – bradv  🍁  03:31, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The sources cited in the article are, admittedly, not great. But whether there are not sufficiently reliable is a closer call, IMHO.  From the ones I looked at, they certainly didn't seem unreliable.  They're not, say, the New York Times or some other large media outlet.  But they seem relatively reliable and there's a non-trivial number of them.  So, I'd weakly support keeping the article. DocFreeman24 (talk) 01:53, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep As said above the sources aren't amazing. That alone isn't enough to damn the article. It's pretty well written and talks about something that IS notable. BJackJS  talk 18:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Can you point out a single source that establish notability under WP:CORP? GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 19:00, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Under WP:ORG WP:INDEPENDANT a large part of decisions for notability. As can be seen with these sources, there isn't any interest for these news sources to publish things about the organization. BJackJS  talk 19:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * What you mean? the first paragraph at WP:ORGCRITE state that A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. so I'm asking for source(s) that satisfy one of notability criteria at WP:ORG. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 19:34, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * If the "news sources" (journalists) don't have any interest in publishing about the subject, that's a good indication it isn't notable. So with that being said, delete. Praxidicae (talk) 19:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable organization with no real indepth coverage. I think the organization in question does not warrant a stand alone article on Wikipedia. - FitIndia  Talk Admin on Commons 12:34, 3 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.