Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himansh Kohli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:46, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Himansh Kohli

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Actor who does not meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Maybe he will become notable in future, but not yet. bonadea contributions talk 05:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Adding a bit to nomination rationale: the actor had one of the starring roles in a TV series, but this has not resulted in any press coverage and it is indicative that the blurb about his being cast in an upcoming film presents him as a "radio jockey", only mentioning the TV series cursorily without including its name (so the series itself is clearly not very notable). All sources are very brief notices and do not constitute anything near significant coverage in multiple sources. Per WP:BEFORE I have spent some time looking for other sources but only found forum posts and Facebook pages - nothing reliable/secondary at all. --bonadea contributions talk 09:55, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 11:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:31, 10 November 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete per nom.  —  Jeff G. ツ  (talk)   23:36, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. The coverage in WP:RS is very cursory and not enough to warrant a WP:BLP. -- Kinu  t/c 06:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:14, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * possible Keep Star role in a major series might be enough--though the WP article on the series does not discuss him, the plot shows him as a central character. But this is the sort of material where an editor in the US cannot usefully find material.  DGG ( talk ) 04:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
 * "Cannot" is a bit too categorical, but I see your point. As a non-American I am rather sensitive to any US-centric bias, and I do wish there was better coverage of notable people and concepts outside North America, so I do try to dig up evidence of notability for these kinds of articles if I can. I'm just not convinced that the series would be characterised as "major" (although it's certainly notable). --bonadea contributions talk 10:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete after several weeks and multiple relisting, this article has failed to generate sufficent references to reliable sources to help it meet WP:RS RadioFan (talk) 14:19, 23 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. The Times of India has a steady coverage  of him and his role in Humse Hai Life.  While the coverage in any one article is not in-depth, taken together they seem to indicate notability for a lead actor in a popular Indian soap.  If this were a US or British leading soap, there would be no question of giving a star actor their own article.  Spinning  Spark  17:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete There is not significant coverage of this person anywhere. The Time Of India articles offer only the most trivial mentioning of him. --Odie5533 (talk) 01:17, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.