Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himarsha Venkatsamy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 06:15, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Himarsha Venkatsamy

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )


 * Delete. Non-notable person. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 07:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. However minor of a model this is, she seems notable and the references seem to stand.  LogicalCreator (talk) 12:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Non-notable per WP:NMODEL. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment – Another source found:
 * This, along with, appears to qualify the topic as meeting WP:BASIC. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:48, 14 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Sufficient inline citations to establish the notability are now present. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The competition was enough to get mainstream coverage, so she won a notable competition, and got coverage for her activities afterwards, such as appearing in a notable film which I added a reference to in the article for. The winner of major American pageants have articles.  No reason why winners of foreign major pageant shouldn't get the same treatment.  It was notable enough to be mentioned in a national newspaper, and led to the winner and runner up getting into a film.   D r e a m Focus  13:22, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: This was BLP-PRODDED 3 minutes after creation (it was created by a newbie editor), because it had no sources.  After one source was added, it was sent to AfD 40 minutes after creation.  Since nominated more sources and content have been added, making a decent notability claim.  I won't formally !vote, as there's really no need to say any more.--Milowent • hasspoken  13:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.