Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himnarcism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete. Yannismarou 12:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Himnarcism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This supposed cult returns an impressive 0 google hits. There's not much else to say. Deranged bulbasaur 06:34, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable - "It has not spread far yet but is developing" is a good sign something isn't notable yet. Very likely hoax. -- Charlene 06:56, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced, possible speedy as there is no assertion of notability. Charlie 07:29, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for the reasons stated above. Slightly Selassie 08:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another day, another joke religion. The stuff about velvet cushions and gum-tree leaves is the giveaway here. BTLizard 10:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Mattinbgn/talk 10:18, 22 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as nonsense. -- Mattinbgn/talk 10:23, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete, I agree, nonsense. Euryalus 10:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * STRONG KEEP: I think this article is worth a fair go and deserves to be kept and improved on. 0 google hits means nothing  Sam360 10:49, 22 May 2007 (UTC)'''
 * Delete. Does this really need a discussion. Could somebody delete this quickly. Assize 11:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.