Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hina Patel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 09:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Hina Patel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:BIO. An article about a self-published author who has received awards from vanity presses Famous Poets Society and the International Library of Poetry. With one exception (Khaasbaat), references are user driven websites. The product of a WP:SPA. Victoriagirl (talk) 13:19, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —  Salih  ( talk ) 17:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - This one seems easy, does not have enough reliable sources other then vanity. This is just my opinion.JimmySmitts (talk) 09:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Do Not Delete - Still working on update to information on providing more references and data. Due to time restrictions have not been able to complete needed tasks yet..dmp1572  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.103.81.25 (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: An article on Hina Patel, created by Dmp1572, was subject of a speedy delete in November. The reason: section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. In short, it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant. Though the user created this article on Hina Patel more than a month ago, the issue has still not been addressed. Victoriagirl (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Userfy. I'm willing to assume that dmp1975 will provide notability information, but he needs to do it pretty much now if he wishes to make this a keeper.  Until then, it should be on his user page.  -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 01:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. If a poet has been published primarily in the publications of the International Library of Poetry, then that poet is not notable. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR/WP:GNG. Self-published poet with no secondary reliable sources. Abecedare (talk) 06:22, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: self-published. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 17:18, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, perhaps even speedily, do not userfy Published and awarded by vanity press. WorldCat has for entries for work authored by Hani Patel. World Cat has information for the one relevant to this discussion, Yours truly : words from within. It is not included in any library.  It is on sale by Amazon, with a rank > 4,000,000. Thus, best information currently available about the subject does not assert significance, let alone notability by way of her writing. No evidence of her meeting AUTHOR. Willing to change position if sufficient evidence of notability arises. I would suggest that even userfication would only serve to market her work, and that if she should ever become notable, there will be more to write about her than this.  Dloh  cierekim  14:34, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.