Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hindi magazines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I'm happy to userfy if anyone wants to work on the article before filing at deletion review; however, in its current state, the consensus is that the article should be deleted. Daniel (talk) 10:00, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Hindi magazines

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

List of email addresses without reliable source and seemingly without any content of value. Wikipedia is not a directory or the Yellow Pages. Alexf(talk) 01:21, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. -- Alexf(talk) 01:22, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * delete - with no prejudice for recreation as a real article about Hindi magazines which could be quite interesting if there are sources. but the current directory is not appropriate and there is nothing in the current article that would be of use in the new article.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  05:10, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep-I will try my best to improve this article. Mala chaubey (talk) 05:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The title must be more definite (e.g. Hindi magazines in the United States) as well as the scope and the structure of the article. See also WP:L. --Søren 20:15, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Martin 4 5 1  23:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Martin 4 5 1  23:53, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, I want to make correction in this article and to improve. -Mala chaubey (talk) 05:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge: List of magazines in Hindi --Ekabhishektalk 13:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The proposed target of the merge suffers the exact same issues as this article!-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  02:04, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Heavy clean-up will be required but the page seems worth keeping. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 12:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * what exactly in the current article could be used in an article that would be an appropriate coverage of the topic? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  15:18, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Under a given period if the article is managed well, it will be worth it to keep, or else delete or merge as per the suggestion by Ekabhishek. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.